EnviroNotes
By E. Ryan Murray, Law Clerk, Environmental Law Department,
Bingham McHale LLP
On February 1, 2008, the Indiana Department of Environmental Management
(“IDEM”) released a draft version of a Non-Rule Policy
Document (“NPD”) setting forth revisions to IDEM’s
policy regarding Supplemental Environmental Projects (“SEPs”). The
2008 Draft SEP NPD (08-003-NPD) is intended to replace the original
SEP NPD that became effective on April 5, 1999. SEPs are
environmentally beneficial projects that enhance public health
or the environment which a violator agrees to perform in return
for a penalty reduction.
The 2008 Draft SEP NPD contains significant changes from the original
1999 SEP Policy including: (1) clarification of the when a SEP
proposal must be made; (2) additional and revised categories of
acceptable SEPs; (3) additional and revised explanations of the
criteria used by IDEM in approving or denying proposed SEPs; and
(4) revised criteria regarding the extent to which assessed gravity-based
civil penalties may be reduced by performance of a SEP. IDEM
intends to present the 2008 Draft SEP NPD to the Indiana Solid
Waste Management Board (“SWMB”) at its meeting scheduled
for May 20, 2008. The new NPD will be effective 30 days after
it is presented to the last of the three rulemaking boards.
With regard to the timing of submission of proposals to perform
SEPs, the 2008 Draft SEP NPD provides some flexibility by requiring
that SEP proposals must be made “as early as possible in
the enforcement process.” The 1999 SEP Policy required
that a SEP proposal be submitted “shortly after the enforcement
process begins.” Neither the original NPD nor the revised
NPD fix a specific time for a SEP submittal and the acceptance
of a SEP remains discretionary on the part of the IDEM.
The 2008 Draft SEP NPD includes two new categories of acceptable
SEPS not listed in the 1999 SEP Policy: community involvement and
public health. According to the 2008 Draft SEP NPD, community
involvement SEPs “support community environmental projects
or outreach, or promote emergency planning and preparedness” and
a public health SEP “provides diagnostic, preventative and/or
a remedial component to human health care which is related to the
actual or potential damage to human health caused by a Violation.” In
addition to these newly listed SEPs, the 2008 Draft SEP NPD expands
the acceptable SEP projects related to environmental restoration
by including projects that involve conservation and protection
of an ecosystem or geographic area.
Unlike the 1999 SEP Policy, the 2008 Draft SEP NPD provides detailed
explanations of the criteria to be used by the IDEM in determining
whether to approve a SEP. Specifically, the 2008 Draft SEP
NPD states that IDEM staff must consider certain enumerated criteria
in assessing a proposed SEP. The 2008 Draft SEP NPD includes
specific conditions under which a SEP may be rejected by the IDEM
even if the project appears to satisfy all the provisions of the
Draft 2008 SEP NPD and lists examples of specific projects that
are not appropriate for SEPs, including projects that were started
or for which funding was identified before the violation was identified
by the IDEM and projects where the violator will be the primary
recipient of the benefits from the project.
Under both the Draft 2008 SEP NPD and the 1999 SEP Policy, Respondents
that perform SEPs are generally allowed offsets of gravity-based
civil penalties in a ratio of 2:1. That is, for every $2
spent on an approved SEP the gravity-based penalty is typically
reduced by $1. However, unlike the 1999 SEP NPD, the 2008
Draft SEP NPD provides a list of specific instances in which the
performance of a SEP may offset a gravity-based penalty by a 1:1
ratio. These instances include: (1) pollution prevention
SEP proposals; (2) environmental conservation, protection, and
restoration SEPs involving a proposal to donate funds to an Internal
Revenue Code § 501(c)(3) environmental or natural resources
not-for-profit organization; (3) SEP proposals submitted by governmental
entities, small businesses, or not-for-profits; (4) SEPs proposed
by respondents that have been issued their first Notice of Violation;
(5) where small gravity-based civil penalties (less than $10,000)
are assessed; (6) SEPS proposed in response to violations of non-federally
delegated programs; and (7) when a 1:1 offset is requested for
a project which goes beyond any legal requirement and results in
direct reductions of pollutants entering the environment or the
actual remediation of contaminated sites. It should be noted
that the use of 1:1 offsets is completely within the discretion
of the IDEM.
A copy of the Draft 2008 SEP NPD is available at http://www.in.gov/idem/rules/policies/enforcement/08-003.pdf. Additional
information regarding the Draft 2008 SEP NPD may be obtained from
Lori Kyle Endris, Chief, Office of Enforcement, at 317-234-1819.
<< Previous Page |