![]() |
||||||
|
Supreme Court Denies Property Owners' Attempt to Delay Condemnation
The Supreme Court reversed the decision of the Court of Appeals and denied the stay. The Waglers argued that the District did not have the power to condemn property; that the District did not provide a good faith offer; and that the trial court improperly consolidated the condemnation cases. The District first sent a letter to the property owners asking that the property be donated, and subsequently sent the offer sheet that is required for condemnation by statute. The Waglers argued that this was not a good-faith offer, as is required by statute, because the District tried to have the property donated. The Supreme Court rejected this argument. The Supreme Court also held that a sewer district does have the power to condemn property, and that the cases were properly consolidated at the trial court. Utilities are free to send requests to property owners asking that the land be donated, if followed by a good-faith offer tendered on the required form.
Other Stories: Bingham McHale LLP to Provide Assistance with Stimulus FundingSupreme Court Denies Property Owners' Attempt to Delay Condemnation McGimpsey named Indiana SuperLawyer Rising Star Jeffersonville Prevails on Delinquent Sewer Fees at Supreme Court |
||||||
|
||||||
|
Utility Update is published by Bingham McHale LLP © 2009. All rights reserved. |
||||||